Arranger
  • -During the day chooses (2 or 3, Which do you think is better?) players to participate in a special night meeting taking place instead of the players other night meetings (mafia meeting etc.)
  • -(Should Arranger participate in the meetings, Not be in the meeting yet see what is said, Or not have any contact with the meeting at all?)
  • -(Either sided with the village or special 3rd party win condition?)
  • -During the meeting the players shall vote to kill someone not in the meeting (or kill someone in the meeting? I think it would be unfair with mafia)
  • -(Should this power be used once per game, or once per night? As of now I believe it's OP, but this is up to you to decide!)
  • ***THIS ROLE IS COMPLETELY OPEN TO ADJUSTMENT AND IDEAS FROM YOU GUYS, NO ATTRIBUTE OF ARRANGER IS SET IN STONE AS OF NOW, BUT THIS IS WHAT IT SHOULD REVOLVE AROUND!***

Suggested Icons

No icons have been suggested yet.

Fanart

No fanart has been added for this role yet.
frogtruck
almost 15 years
Seems more balanced, but since yo're the first to comment we'll see what everyone else says and if they agree with you.
SuperGanondorf
almost 15 years
3 people should probably be in the meeting, 2 would make it more like jailer. Meetings should be anonymous to all but the arranger to make things a bit more interesting and a bit more balanced. This would make most sense as a town role, since it's not like people would want to cooperate with a 3rd party as readily. If they have the ability to kill, once a game would be more appropriate than once a night.