I really feel like this should be a maf role

Should also disable voting if lynched.

Wait how does the day end if no one can vote?!?

If it was a mafia role, that would actually work.

isnt this just a leader with no voting instead of anon voting

negative virgin

Best strat for this role might be just to ask to be lynched or shot by town.

It cant be a potential clear, it has no way of proving itself.

this role should be a different colour, because it kind of looks like a maf role

Negative utility role. Mafia actively benefits from it being in the game; could balance a too townsided setup.

Plus this can be used to balance setups more accurately compared to the lk which 90% of the time the game turns into an inconvenient spam fest usually resulting in a nl.

It all depends on the setup. I see this role as a potential clear that needs to either stay hidden or kept safe, similar to the lightkeeper, leader and civilian.

Bad examples. Hunter can still benefit town (taking a maf with them) and lightkeeper doesn't make it literally impossible to pull off a lynch. In most situations, this would give mafia an extra kill for free. Not every town role has to benefit town of course, but with leader and lightkeeper at least town can pull something off if they're not already screwed.

@Logan yes just like when maf kills lk or town lynches hunter.

I don't get the point of this role though, wouldn't it be more beneficial for the mafia, of anything?