Epicmafia

Back to Off Topic

Trump vs. Hillary

deletedalmost 9 years

Who's excited? it's going to be a battle for the ages

Trump2016

Who??

Trump

Hillary

deletedalmost 9 years

are you saying bernie still has a chance to come back? or that trump will be dethroned?

deletedalmost 9 years

Those are NOT the nominations. The nominations are not complete. The only reason these two have gotten so far is because people have ASSUMED them winners. I'm sick of that. I'm waiting till the nominations are complete.

madhere

almost 9 years

>i dont like my choices so i am angry that i have a choice
what do you want? an autocracy?

deletedalmost 9 years

What the hell? If it's trump vs Hillary I may as well not vote at all. This is ridiculous. I'm not playing to this fantasy. I refuse to believe they will be the nominees.

deletedalmost 9 years

Who else is protest voting third party this election?

deletedalmost 9 years

Hibiki says

Slowbro says

edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does

huh

i made a post and then i edited it

Hibiki

almost 9 years

Slowbro says

edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does

huh

Orly

almost 9 years

the bernie dream is dead so now i will become an ironic trump supporter

wish me luck, lads

Orly

almost 9 years

Orly

almost 9 years

Orly

almost 9 years

little marco was too low energy

deletedalmost 9 years

edit: nevermind it doesn't mean what i think it does

TheSpicyMango

almost 9 years

both are terrible

deletedalmost 9 years

Rutab was one of the most ubiquitous posters in this thread until his guy (Marco Rubio) failed to win the state in which he is a sitting senator and dropped out with his tail between his legs.

deletedalmost 9 years

Correct

deletedalmost 9 years

rutab says

hey everyone who even cares about this right now March Madness is happening

people who care about something shouldn't IMO, instead care about this thing i care about

Hibiki

almost 9 years

republicans are subhuman

deletedalmost 9 years

I just hear words "break up the big banks" and go.

no where in those words did anyone clarify how! that's why I literally ask "does that mean a rule..."

so excuuuuuuse me

Also, what banks failed or were close to failing in 2008, lehman brothers, merill lynch? are those commercial or have a commercial arm? nope? okay....wait, so what's the problem then?

Edark

almost 9 years

Im pretty sure you dont realize what breaking up the banks mean when you make arguments like these:

Germatron says

also, while I admit the banks may be too big (may in italics)

The idea of the government breaking up a company is a slippery road.

Also, does that mean a rule would need to be put into place saying "once a bank gets X big, we break it up!"

How do you quantify X? But the bigger issue is how will the banks that are

deletedalmost 9 years

hey everyone who even cares about this right now March Madness is happening

deletedalmost 9 years

Kylo says

Slowbro says

i've always heard and said it as "la zay"

Maybe you think I'm a bigot because my sense of humor is too tongue-in-cheek for you. Maybe that's it.

if bigot is now the word for different then yes

deletedalmost 9 years

I see edark finally found his words.

was that so hard

I see your point, but I still disagree

deletedalmost 9 years

Slowbro says

i've always heard and said it as "la zay"

Maybe you think I'm a bigot because my sense of humor is too tongue-in-cheek for you. Maybe that's it.

Edark

almost 9 years

Germatron says

Slowbro says

you don't diversify industries, you diversify a portfolio

yes, but edarks arguemnt for breaking up the big banks is diversifying...so, I guess he thinks you do

Separation between investment banking and retail banking is what "breaking up" the banks means

deletedalmost 9 years

i've always heard and said it as "la zay"

edit: actually i'm pretty sure that was the joke too