the fact that crier on mafiascum isn't clear changes everything. I didn't see any such role listed so I assumed it was specific to EM...
deletedabout 8 years
Sin answer me this: What mindset do you think Mist made this set up with cause "crier" on mafia scum isn't clear "crier" on epic mafia is and that's the issue here would she use Mafiascum mindset or EM
ugggggggggh why do i have to try to use WORDS to EXPLAIN THINGS
specifically the PAPUITO read
honestly that read is so bad and you don't react when i explain to you why it's bad so i'm gonna take that as a scumclaim unless you explain yourself
or at least i won't unvote until you do
You didn't really counter my point when i read your statement but:
there's not a point because it's easy to be a mafia crier You guys are treating him like a clear so that's what I meant by it my point is I think the crier is there like "oh it's normally a town role so let's clear it!"
Mist.
Would not.
Implement a role.
With the assumption that town would assume that role was clear
if they were mafia.
That would make this a LOL IT CENSORS B@STARD game.
Your logic depends entirely on CRIER being a role EXPECTED TO BE TOWN. If it made sense for crier to be scum, mist would not expect or want us to assume crier was town.
edit: edited
Do you see anyone but me doubting the crier claim? No everyone is like: PAP BE AUTO CLEAR I've played games where scum criers exists so sorry for not auto believing it when Pap was one of my sr's!
can you link me the games?
It makes no sense to me that a host would implement a scum role WITH THE EXPECTATION THAT TOWN WOULD ASSUME THEY WERE CLEAR
Like, a PLAYER might wifom by trying to lead people on logic that makes 0 sense, but the host wouldn't encourage it.
I'm trying to explain this as clearly as possible and just. ugh. I wish I could borrow Jeff's way with words
deletedabout 8 years
ugggggggggh why do i have to try to use WORDS to EXPLAIN THINGS
specifically the PAPUITO read
honestly that read is so bad and you don't react when i explain to you why it's bad so i'm gonna take that as a scumclaim unless you explain yourself
or at least i won't unvote until you do
You didn't really counter my point when i read your statement but:
there's not a point because it's easy to be a mafia crier You guys are treating him like a clear so that's what I meant by it my point is I think the crier is there like "oh it's normally a town role so let's clear it!"
Mist.
Would not.
Implement a role.
With the assumption that town would assume that role was clear
if they were mafia.
That would make this a LOL IT CENSORS B@STARD game.
Your logic depends entirely on CRIER being a role EXPECTED TO BE TOWN. If it made sense for crier to be scum, mist would not expect or want us to assume crier was town.
edit: edited
Do you see anyone but me doubting the crier claim? No everyone is like: PAP BE AUTO CLEAR I've played games where scum criers exists so sorry for not auto believing it when Pap was one of my sr's!
ugggggggggh why do i have to try to use WORDS to EXPLAIN THINGS
specifically the PAPUITO read
honestly that read is so bad and you don't react when i explain to you why it's bad so i'm gonna take that as a scumclaim unless you explain yourself
or at least i won't unvote until you do
You didn't really counter my point when i read your statement but:
there's not a point because it's easy to be a mafia crier You guys are treating him like a clear so that's what I meant by it my point is I think the crier is there like "oh it's normally a town role so let's clear it!"
Mist.
Would not.
Implement a role.
With the assumption that town would assume that role was clear
if they were mafia.
That would make this a LOL IT CENSORS B@STARD game.
Your logic depends entirely on CRIER being a role EXPECTED TO BE TOWN. If it made sense for crier to be scum, mist would not expect or want us to assume crier was town.
edit: edited
deletedabout 8 years
To put it simply: Everyone unvoted Pap for being a Crier and I think that's wrong and NAI
deletedabout 8 years
I HAVE OUTTED READS
Just cause you don't agree with my reads doesn't mean I haven't outted reads
You out reads but don't give reasons for them. do some scumhunting then?????
YES I HAVE YOU BIMBO READ THE THREAD And you think I'm the dumb one lol
Yeeeee, had to write a satire similar in regards to Swift's "A Modest Proposal".
deletedabout 8 years
specifically the PAPUITO read
honestly that read is so bad and you don't react when i explain to you why it's bad so i'm gonna take that as a scumclaim unless you explain yourself
or at least i won't unvote until you do
You didn't really counter my point when i read your statement but:
there's not a point because it's easy to be a mafia crier You guys are treating him like a clear so that's what I meant by it my point is I think the crier is there like "oh it's normally a town role so let's clear it!"
I have been thinking a lot lately about the benefits of having all Americans chipped and controlled by one person who decides what is correct and how everyone should live. After much thought, I have decided that the person with the best judgment to run all chipped Americans is, not shockingly, me. I have logged onto Facebook a lot lately and everyone in my feed has been posting their own (wrong) political beliefs and (horrid) religious beliefs and I have really come to realize that I am the last remaining person in this country that is right about absolutely everything. Due to the belief that I am right and everyone around me is wrong, I have often felt inclined to do what the rest of the nation does which would be to kill everyone who disagrees with me and whoever I can’t kill I should probably just yell and scream at until they are even more polarized against me. Sadly, the idea that it is effective to insult everyone who disagrees with you to the point of mental breakdowns has led our country into this mess. Therefore, I was led to my previous proposal, the necessity of robot Americans that I control.
at first i thought this was a copypasta but then i saw the part about screaming
I have been thinking a lot lately about the benefits of having all Americans chipped and controlled by one person who decides what is correct and how everyone should live. After much thought, I have decided that the person with the best judgment to run all chipped Americans is, not shockingly, me. I have logged onto Facebook a lot lately and everyone in my feed has been posting their own (wrong) political beliefs and (horrid) religious beliefs and I have really come to realize that I am the last remaining person in this country that is right about absolutely everything. Due to the belief that I am right and everyone around me is wrong, I have often felt inclined to do what the rest of the nation does which would be to kill everyone who disagrees with me and whoever I can’t kill I should probably just yell and scream at until they are even more polarized against me. Sadly, the idea that it is effective to insult everyone who disagrees with you to the point of mental breakdowns has led our country into this mess. Therefore, I was led to my previous proposal, the necessity of robot Americans that I control.
Saying people are too scummy to be scum or too townie to be town and therefore voting opposite of that does not make you a good player if you are right. It means you used terrible logic and got lucky.
did ANYONE say that?
No but that's usually the logic behind townreading an extremely scummy anti town player.
alternatively, maybe people just think she's town, because they see something you don't or read in a different way from you
Saying people are too scummy to be scum or too townie to be town and therefore voting opposite of that does not make you a good player if you are right. It means you used terrible logic and got lucky.
did ANYONE say that?
No but that's usually the logic behind townreading an extremely scummy anti town player.