This is an incredibly multi faceted issue and to try and reduce such a complicated and emotionally distressing subject into a binary option between two bitterly opposed factions isn't good for anyone.
Though I'd be more inclined to side with the pro-life ground due to the scientific evidence the word "Murder" and "human" in the poll are very loaded (though I wouldn't necessarily agree with the presupposed conclusions drawn from such statements) and I felt uncomfortable to perhaps vote what my heart would say in respect for the women who go through an abortion and the circumstances involved.
Linke is correct, the specific paradox you're referring is the Achilles and the tortoise.
Ever since the development of calculus, limits, ect. We've known the infinities can exists and are capable of being "completed" we can even define values within infinite sets of a discrete nature.
Because if time were a highway, and I was riding it all night long, I would argue that the tree I’m passing by right now is the present, not the house ahead of me.
Time can't be eternal, imagine an infinite road. You are heading to your house called present.
The present is in the middle of infinity.
Will you ever arrive there?
deletedalmost 6 years
[/quote]she doesn't believe that it is killing a child, so you're argument is meaningless. you two are arguing about nothing because you are on completely different foundations, just as VanityPrime said.[/quote]But doesn't she understand there has to be a line that has to be drawn!?! In my honest opinion, i see people trying to make this a sexism deba....oh sht, THATS what you mean
