(1) The strategy almost always works for me unless the people I'm playing with are too closed-minded to understand my methods. I have a good sense for peoples' reactions, which while not infallible, is fairly accurate. I just need to get people to react to something first. (2) You used 'threw' instead of 'through'. (3) You're right. It's really hard to convince idiots they're idiots. I've been trying to convince you for three days now.
Obviously I threw the game, any mod with a brain would know that. But I am fine with throwing the game if it means not following something as stupid as that reaction test. I am not defending myself from throwing the game, I am trying to convince you that you are an idiot. Of course, convincing an idiot that s/he is an idiot takes a lot of work, and quite frankly I don't think you're smart enough to realize your own idiocy. So, I'm done trying to convince you. And don't get it threw your head that some how you "won" this argument, because you were arguing something that I had already accepted, and I was trying to explain to you that you are an idiot. But, maybe I was doing a poor job so I'll say it out front for a final time. You did a stupid thing, and because you defend that stupid thing you are an idiot. The act of committing a stupid thing does not make you stupid, its the defending of that act as something it isn't. I hope you become smarter and remember, God blesses the weak.
http://postimage.org/image/17r2bwf9g/ As depicted here, you continued to throw the game after I stated that it was a reaction test, not a coin/dice flip. You acknowledged it as such. Thus, even after knowing that I did not break the rules, you chose to break them yourself by losing the game on purpose and not lynching your cc. All arguments on your side from this point forward are you defending your breach of rules with nothing but opinions, and are therefore null. Good game.
I told you afterwards ingame that I did not flip a coin, and you still refused to listen. Lucid posted on front page that play styles are not against the rules in training. Reaction tests are a play style. Gamethrowing, however, IS against the rules. So allow me to make a slight change to your interpretation: I am about to win game, you throw the game, I rage.
Chicken, I explained this once, I will explain this again. I DID NOT FLIP A COIN. It was a REACTION TEST. There. Was. No. Coin. I was seeing how each of you reacted to it. And until you started being an idiot, I had the mafia figured out. Unfortunately, you wouldn't listen to that ingame. Read over some of my games my games, I do this often to see how people act, so chances are if I play any ranked games you'll see it. It's not always right, but it gives something to go off of. Great job breaking it, hero.
Yet in the end, chicken, if you had followed me we would have won. Instead you chose to throw the game. So clearly whatever I was doing was working up until your idiocy.
you are an idiot for reporting me... i was not gamethrowing at all as there was a plan behind it. if that guy hadnt vegged town could still have easily won
The situation was a 50-50 between village and mafia win. The player vegging was a clear, and you and the other player were the 2 remaining non clear blues. The proper decision is to let the player veg - as all players get their heart back. You handed mafia the win. It was game throwing, but I am not reporting you, as your intent was not malicious. Just understand that all players could have gotten their hearts back, and had a legitimate chance to win with it.