deletedover 8 years

Hello people of Sandbox and the spectators from Main.

In this thread we will debate whether or not Sandbox reports should be handled by site mods once again or if bebop and his mod team should have full control over Sandbox reports and Sandbox rules.

Should Sandbox return?
19
I do not care
14
No. bebop and his mods are doing just fine.
12
Yes. It is clear that SandExit is not working.
over 8 years
five.
over 8 years
I dont really think there would be a huge difference regardless if you "sandreturn" or not, considering bebop and fnoof already are moderators to begin with.
over 8 years

fnoof says

it's really easy not to get a hc violation! if you had any basic human decency you wouldn't have to sit here exploring the rabbit hole of an admittedly nebulous rule. the ease of moderation on slurs was a compromise to cater to

Spoiler
annoying and terrible users

but i'm not going to budge on the n-word. fight me on that if you wish.


deletedover 8 years
She said she's using the turd twister spaghetti adapter to make you dinner, how thoughtless of you :(
deletedover 8 years
This is a thread to discuss whether or not SandReturn is necessary. Not whatever the love of your life was talking about.
deletedover 8 years
Why has the love of my life been muted???
deletedover 8 years

BabaCakes says

i honestly have no clue how some of you got this deep into the internet but cant google 'which slurs should i not say on the internet'. honestly thats why we should have zero tolerance on slurs. its so bizarre to come back to this site and seeing how its clearly being run by [SPOILER ALERT] annoying and terrible users because the mods have decided they'd rather just let those users do whatever they want.

honestly, these users know that none of you are willing to ban anyone for longer than 2 seconds. they'll continue using language that attacks and mocks black, queer, and/or disabled users.

wet noodle


I don't think any slurs should be said. But when they are said, it shouldn't be up to chance whether they are vio'd or not.
deletedover 8 years

Bebop says


Ayd says

If only that worked with everyone who got modded


still upset that you didn't get modded a few months ago?


Not Really LOL I don't think it would've lasted long either tbh, You still upset I baited out you out in that main lobby thread?
over 8 years

Bebop says


Blister says

the only way for there to be an objective standard in moderating HC reports is for there to be an absolute zero tolerance policy on all slurs or none at all. that way each mod is on the same page. now, obviously, nobody wants these blanket approaches to this rule, so you attempt to strike a balance between the two. this means the rule itself becomes grey - as error says, different mods, different perspectives. bebop is not error. amelio is not tricksterer. platypops is not merlot. one may decide spelling out the n-word in chat is vio-worthy, another may not.

if you think there's a problem, it's not the mods' fault, it's the rule itself. there's just no way to moderate it objectively without upsetting a group of people. so the situation we have now is the best you can hope for, i think.

and what problems does it cause? some poor sap gets chatbanned an hour while his buddy does not. big whoop. really does not matter in the grand scheme of things. this constant avalanche of whinging and complaining will never solve anything.

i know this is rich coming from me, but please grow up.


tfw blister becoming a mod changes him for the good


Mod me it will be the same.
deletedover 8 years

Ohdearmycatisgone says

Or perhaps form an actual response to anything I said.

over 8 years

Ayd says

If only that worked with everyone who got modded


still upset that you didn't get modded a few months ago?
over 8 years
Mybe if it was something more serioud than a one hour chat ban it shpuld be discussed by the mod team so that diff opinions will be considered and a middle ground is found.
deletedover 8 years
If only that worked with everyone who got modded
over 8 years

Blister says

the only way for there to be an objective standard in moderating HC reports is for there to be an absolute zero tolerance policy on all slurs or none at all. that way each mod is on the same page. now, obviously, nobody wants these blanket approaches to this rule, so you attempt to strike a balance between the two. this means the rule itself becomes grey - as error says, different mods, different perspectives. bebop is not error. amelio is not tricksterer. platypops is not merlot. one may decide spelling out the n-word in chat is vio-worthy, another may not.

if you think there's a problem, it's not the mods' fault, it's the rule itself. there's just no way to moderate it objectively without upsetting a group of people. so the situation we have now is the best you can hope for, i think.

and what problems does it cause? some poor sap gets chatbanned an hour while his buddy does not. big whoop. really does not matter in the grand scheme of things. this constant avalanche of whinging and complaining will never solve anything.

i know this is rich coming from me, but please grow up.


tfw blister becoming a mod changes him for the good
over 8 years

Blister says

the only way for there to be an objective standard in moderating HC reports is for there to be an absolute zero tolerance policy on all slurs or none at all. that way each mod is on the same page. now, obviously, nobody wants these blanket approaches to this rule, so you attempt to strike a balance between the two. this means the rule itself becomes grey - as error says, different mods, different perspectives. bebop is not error. amelio is not tricksterer. platypops is not merlot. one may decide spelling out the n-word in chat is vio-worthy, another may not.

if you think there's a problem, it's not the mods' fault, it's the rule itself. there's just no way to moderate it objectively without upsetting a group of people. so the situation we have now is the best you can hope for, i think.

and what problems does it cause? some poor sap gets chatbanned an hour while his buddy does not. big whoop. really does not matter in the grand scheme of things. this constant avalanche of whinging and complaining will never solve anything.

i know this is rich coming from me, but please grow up.


only a sith deals in absolutes
deletedover 8 years

can't wait until payday
deletedover 8 years
ive transcedned past ur wordl

ur alll frigging insects
deletedover 8 years
@red where????
deletedover 8 years

sweetnkind says

do you think one day there will maybe be a cookie cutter like device that when you attach it to your bum it shapes your poop


it already exists in the form of the sandbox forums
deletedover 8 years

sweetnkind says

do you think one day there will maybe be a cookie cutter like device that when you attach it to your bum it shapes your poop


those already exist
deletedover 8 years
do you think one day there will maybe be a cookie cutter like device that when you attach it to your bum it shapes your poop
deletedover 8 years
if you say so
over 8 years
I'm morally inferior because I'm a queer person who says f*ggot I guess.
over 8 years
BabaCakes is a toxic troll, my people, do not listen to a word he says. It's propaganda.
over 8 years
i honestly have no clue how some of you got this deep into the internet but cant google 'which slurs should i not say on the internet'. honestly thats why we should have zero tolerance on slurs. its so bizarre to come back to this site and seeing how its clearly being run by [SPOILER ALERT] annoying and terrible users because the mods have decided they'd rather just let those users do whatever they want.

honestly, these users know that none of you are willing to ban anyone for longer than 2 seconds. they'll continue using language that attacks and mocks black, queer, and/or disabled users.

wet noodle